144 Namisugi to 133-2 Shimowano, Takada-cho, Rikuzentakada-shi, Iwate
Rivers and river parks
In the Takada area, which was severely damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011, a land use plan was formulated to raise the entire residential area, and Kawahara River Park was incorporated into the plan. This is an important perspective to incorporate the river as a natural foundation in a city that has been drastically transformed by mankind.
This work is a project to design the Kawahara River and the park located along the river as an integrated space and connect it to the raised city. Shinichi Yoshimura, who is familiar with river administration and has experience in river design, joined the project as design supervisor, and a joint prefectural and municipal committee of practitioners coordinated the project. Ltd. was in charge of the river design, Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. was in charge of the park basic design, and the park implementation design was undertaken by Ryokkei-Kyodo Sekkei Design Joint Venture.
The river is now three times deeper (8 to 9 m) than it was before the earthquake due to the construction fill. The core of the design in this work is a spatial design that transforms the deepening river into a familiar living space. We aimed to create a spatial form that integrates the complex shapes and bustling life created by the river that makes people want to approach the water’s edge without feeling its depth, the river’s various shapes that are not uniform, and the views of Mt. An “integrated space” cannot be created simply by combining a river and a park. In order to create a “town space that is both a river and a park,” the boundary between the river and the park was not defined, but the boundary between the river and the park was determined as a result of the integrated design. However, there is no boundary as a space, and a space that is both a river and a park was designed.
The “love for the Kawahara River” of the city hall staff and local residents also encouraged the project. Tree planting on the river site, a submerged bridge to be submerged during flooding, and a “controlled bridge” for residents to cross were realized through the wise decision of the river administrator. Soon after its completion, children from Takada Nursery School began to play there, making it an educational site. Weeding work by the Kawahara River Fan Club and local residents and “Let’s Play on the Kawahara River” activities are just a few of the events that have taken place, which are an inheritance of the lives of the children in the past and will lead to the future.
This is probably the only example of a reconstruction project that makes the most of the river. The Kawahara River is the axis of inheritance of nature, culture, and memories of Rikuzentakata.
Rikuzentakata City was devastated by the Great East Japan Earthquake, and while the entire city was raised to make it safe from the tsunami, the height difference between the city and the Kawahara River, which originally flows through the center of the city, is large. The challenge for the Kawahara River was to overcome this difference in elevation while preserving the memory of the river and creating an attractive waterfront area. As one can see from entering the river at the site, the concern about the height difference was unfounded.
The distance from the riverbed to the water’s edge is natural. From the riverbed to the height of the town, the landscape is like an embankment, and it is a natural part of the river landscape. The simple design of the bridges, which are placed here and there, allows visitors to enjoy the flow of the river and creates an attractive soundscape with the sound of the rapids, which must have been intentionally created. It is a place where children might venture out to the water’s edge. In fact, it seems to produce “kawagaki,” and on the day of the inspection, kawagaki were out early in the morning catching fish with mysids, accompanied by their sleepy father.
Wherever possible, the slope of the river channel has been changed to create a hydrophilic slope, trees have been left standing, and the shoulders of the river have been carefully designed to create a green space, creating an expansive and pleasant landscape. In the upper reaches of the river, which were not damaged by the tsunami, trees remain to preserve the memory of the Kawahara River, creating a landscape that links the past with the future. Perhaps for this reason, many citizens use the area for strolling and enjoy the waterside in a very relaxed manner. Numerous benches have been placed and the shade under the bridge is well used.
The river has been created to give courage to the reconstruction of the city and to give children dreams for the future. (Nakamura)
We walked along the river from downstream to upstream. Perhaps because the undulations, including Mt. Hyogami, were visible in the space, we hardly felt that we were at the bottom of the raised ground. The terrain, the trail, and the river were so well arranged that one might think that in the future, when the trees grow up, this area will feel like a natural terrain. This is probably due to the unique arrangement of the retaining wall revetment, abandoned stones, and the sloping embankment made of earthworks.
At the upstream end of the site, trees from before the disaster were left behind, and without information, it would have been difficult to tell what had been done to the site, which made me groan at the skill of the design supervisors. From there, we walked toward the downstream section, but our impression of what lay ahead remained the same.
It was after 3:00 on a weekday when I visited the site, and several people were already strolling. After a while, several people who appeared to be high school students leaving school arrived in groups, scattered here and there in the park, and finally gathered at a small bridge on the Kawahara River to chat, which the townspeople could see from the bridge connecting the raised ground.
The Hyokamiyama mountain could be seen in the background, confirming that the design intent of creating “a space in the city that is both a river and a park” was a success. We highly evaluated the realization of the design intent and the fact that it is familiar to the citizens, and awarded it the Grand Prize.
However, we were disappointed with the silhouette of the bridge, which is an important visual object as a river landscape. Although it seems that it is not subject to entry (evaluation), I would like to note here, as a preliminary request to those who may do similar projects in the future, that it would have become a space that looks different even if the fascia line was at least run through to the abutment and the parent pillar was placed in the proper position. (Matsui)